GANG ATTACKING ADMINS

Though fully aware of being gaslighted, RandyKnotts surgically responded and calmly detailed how the subject was provably notable. Then, in light of the new bad-faith objections being well overcome, he again requested reinstatement of the draft, also pointing out that it was standard Teahouse procedure to receive six months as a chance to improve upon any objections. One of the stalking admins already nipping and growling, a friend of Jim F. Bleak called SarekofVulcan, began to further gang attack with false statements about Teahouse. With a gaseous tone, the admin absurdly claimed the mentioned Teahouse procedures weren't true.

It almost seemed that the undeserving admins were completely ignorant of Teahouse procedures because they weren't involved with it or authorized by Teahouse to review drafts. Either that, or they were bold faced lying about it. Given their years of Wikipedia trolling, the latter is assumed. By this point, it's obvious that Jim F. Bleak was never going to undo anything. The draft article was in the trash exactly where he wanted it, and now all he wanted was RandyKnotts dispatched too. He continued to move from new excuse to new excuse, and each was properly dismantled for what it was, bogus excuses to not right the malicious wrong.

The admin buckled down and further ratcheted up his gaslighting games with even more personally insulting language and by fracturing the discussion. Discussion fracturing is when a person continues the discussion for no apparent reason on an entirely different page, only adding confusion and making it difficult to follow along clearly with what's happening. The wronged editor immediately stayed with Jim F. Bleak moving to his own talk page where the discussion continued. He responded just as skillfully and made it clear that the fracturing was harmful to the issue, and requested that the discussion now stay on his talk page where Jim F. Bleak had inappropriately moved it to, to avoid any further confusion.

The seething admin began to post that he didn't even see the point in continuing the discussion, and implied that the editor was incapable of understanding him. RandyKnotts continued by dismantling each post by the admin. Suddenly the admin moved the conversation back to his own talk page and then abruptly back again to the editor's talk page, with even more bad-faith objections and gaslighting.

Then in an emphatic outburst, Jim F. Bleak unexpectedly proclaimed he must now move on, because as he claimed, he hadn't even been answered about a (ridiculous) inquiry he'd made in a post. However, RandyKnotts had answered and skillfully at that, but on the other talk page where the admin had posted it.

Next page: Wikipedia Crushing a Whistleblower