The Trenches of Wikipedia

Unless you've been The Trenches of Wikipedia of editing Wikipedia over the past several years, you'll be shocked by the story you're about to hear.
Evidence of everything described in this story had to first be collected before this story could be published,
because on Wikipedia, admins have a way of
making the unwanted disappear.
Some of what you'll read has already been deleted by Wikipedian admins, but that was expected.
Everything was protected like kittens first.
Admins run the show on Wikipedia. Admins are editors who have been given power from other admins who liked them enough to grant power.
Those power granting admins themselves
received power in the past in the same way.
Once in power, an admin rarely loses their power
as long as their account stays
fairly active, unless there is a falling out regarding internal politics.
Most of the controllers of Wikipedia have had their admin power for 15-25 years, and most received their adminship prior to 2005.
Once they attain power and get established in the ranks, they act virtually unchallenged and are almost impossible to remove.
This particular story demonstrates the toxic and unfair environment that has been cultivated behind the scenes of Wikipedia to
keep outsiders remaining outside.
First, a bit of background about the seven specific admins who were a direct part of this story,
a riveting account which will have you questioning
whether no encylopedia would have been a better idea.
Wikipedia consists of ten different encylopedias based on ten of
the world's popular languages,
with English being the primary and also the focus of everything in this story.
If you've ever read a Wikipedia article in English,
there's a good chance these admins or
their admin friends had absolute control over what you were allowed to read,
right down to every allowed word and punctuation.
The following seven Wikipedian admins are all directly involved in the dubious dealings you'll soon learn about.
This group of seven admins shamelessly acted together in an organized bad-faith manner against just one editor, RandyKnotts.
However, RandyKnotts was not to be underestimated. He has an astounding talent which will become clear to you as everything unfolds.
It also must be said that RandyKnotts was on the side of good, which should also never be underestimated.
We'll first learn more about these power wielding admins which make up a sampling of the people
who currently control the world's ubiquitous encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
This story contains real examples of petty grudges, quintessential bias, and bad-faith acts which are routine for admins,
and for which there are rarely any consequences.
After all, the biggest fear of most admins is losing their admin power,
so they rarely stand up to the corruption from within.

JIMFBLEAK hails from near Derbyshire England, and currently has blocked almost 40,000 Wikipedia editors, mostly Americans.
The numbers are staggering.
One miserable person really banned that many
contributors trying to edit on Wikipedia.
Jimfbleak takes great joy in blocking other editors, and has been caught making statements confirming as much.
He promotes the impression that he's a cultured world traveler and he may just be a bored trustfunder feeling inadequate.
His most recent whirlwind trip was an evidence deleting adventure,
in which he quickly
deleted tens of thousands of characters all related to his admin actions and statements made by him.
Some of what he deleted were of himself bragging to another admin friend about unnecessarily blocking an editor he had a grudge against.
The newly blocked editor had not even logged in to make an edit in five years. When joked with about it, Jim F. Bleak
bragged that his block was meant to
"put a stake in their heart and
make sure they're dead".
He says he's interested in birding but his most obsessive interest seems to be in the vanity of his Wikipedian statistics:
185,184 other editors' edits deleted, 219,902 other editors' pages deleted, 35,752 other editors blocked from Wikipedia.
Now, here are some statistics that Jim F. Bleak doesn't want known...
Almost immediately after his admin friend SarekofVulcan blocked an editor RandyKnotts in retaliation for threatening to
blow the whistle on the both of them,
the Derbyshire admin immediately made a series of five massive deletions.
Jim F. Bleak quickly destroyed evidence in
places which included his user talk page.
From Sept 4th 2025 to Sept 11th 2025,
five statistically irregular massive data deletions
totaling 48,915 characters were completed by him on his talk page alone.
Among the self incriminating evidence which was hurriedly deleted, was the revealing response he had made to another admin friend Deepfriedokra,
as the two mucked it up about the blocking of the editor
who hadn't even edited in five years.
They viciously ensure that outside editors remain dead.
Murder is how admins like Jim F. Bleak see their powerful blocks against other editors they don't like.
When making these statistically irregular five massive deletions, the admin gave the coy reason of "clearing old" in the required summary field.
Clearing evidence would have been more accurate.
Jim F. Bleak and his old friend SarekofVulcan are a powerful and
wily duo on Wikipedia.
If you don't have adminship on the site and you challenge either of them, you can be certain that they may be plotting to murder you from the encyclopedia too.

© Copyright. All rights reserved.